This website is a reproduction of www.hfest.net. It IS NOT affiliated with Motion Twin (the creators of Hammerfest).
You will not be able to play Hammerfest here. More information.
Click on a flag to switch website: 🇫🇷🇪🇸🇺🇸
Difficult to answer... I usually don't fight for things, I accept them as they are. But when I see a good way, ecologists would be the first ones to be supported by me. I care more for environment than for yet another 10k humans killed by an earthquake, flood wave, or war, even if this sounds cruel. There are too many humans, so I am fine with some of them randomly dying. Note: I said randomly - so I am not fine with people dying in Africa because our pharma industry does not want to give them what they need!
I found this question interesting - though very difficult for me (because I try to avoid misunderstandings, which often results in long texts). So the same one again for the next poster.
Oh, one short PS: About the "cruel" sentence: Of course I feel with the friends, families etc of those who die in catastrophes like that - so I would not call myself cruel, but rather... "rational". I just found the word "reasoner" in a dictionary.
actually, i don't really care as much about the environment as other things. although, you must define what you mean by 'saving the environment.' if you mean, 'stop global warming' then i think thats just a bunch of BS. (i heard that someone quoted somewhere in the midwest having more snow one year as being a proof of global warming.) if you mean, stop strip miners and that sort of thing, if thats what you go for then cool.
the next poster strongly dislikes words that are too vague/ have so many meanings that they don't really mean anything.